Thursday, 5 December 2013

Women in the military? But they can't handle it?!

If you have seen any war movie set before the 21st century or read historical accounts of conflicts, you'd be hard pressed to find female soldiers anywhere near the action.Female members of an armed force are a rarity in movies and other media, aside from women involved in non-combat roles such as nurses and clerks and the such.

In films depicting conflicts from before the 21st century, let's take Saving Private Ryan for example. It's a film set during the Invasion of Normandy in World War 2, we get to witness hundreds of soldiers on both sides in combat. Notice something? Not a single female combatant in sight. It wasn't just Normandy either, or even World War 2 in general, but women have not really had a role in warfare since the beginning of recorded history. Of course there are always exceptions, accounts of tribes of warrior women in ancient times, the female Soviet Snipers of the second world war, so on and so forth. But this doesn't discount the fact that it has been men who have been doing most of the fighting, why is that?

Well we must remember how women were viewed back then, they were seen as property, possessions. They were seen as weak, and frail, and not up to the same physical standards of men. While there is some truth to that, on average men are larger and stronger than women, that doesn't mean the the women who can pass the same physical requirements as their male counterparts shouldn't be able to serve. This was the case for the militaries of many countries. For many years women around the world were not allowed to serve in combat roles. It also wasn't just because of their physical make up, but it was also feared that men would not give them the same amount of trust or respect as they would fellow male soldiers, it was also feared that they would become distractions. This inequality between men and women in the military is has just started to be amended in recent years.

Nichola Goddard, first Canadian female combat soldier
killed in Afghanistan
Slowly as the fight for women's rights progressed, so did their roles in world militaries, Canada, Israel, and various European countries have allowed women to serve and fight alongside men. Israel is unique in that it is the only country in the world that has mandatory conscription for women, as opposed to just men. The United States was kind of slow to the catch, with women being given the right to serve in Combat Roles just this year, in 2013. Previously, even if women met all the standards, physical and otherwise, as their male counterparts, they were still denied combat roles.

In retrospect the fight for equality between the sexes in all facets of society is noticeably progressing, it's hard to get rid of the tradition of males seen as the ones to carry all the burden of fighting for ones country when the need arises, but it's moving forward.

Articles:
http://www.debate.org/opinions/should-women-serve-in-the-military
http://www.democratandchronicle.com/story/news/local/2013/10/11/challenges-faced-by-women-in-military-discussed-/2969357/

Questions to consider:

1. Do you think that most women would be able to handle military life?
2. How do you think the stereotypes surrounding women would change once they become more accepted in worldwide military communities?
3. What challenges could an aspiring female soldier face from her family, peers?

3 comments:

  1. In my opinion, I believe that woman are able to handle military life and combat. For instance if you consider a group of 100 woman, there is a chance that a majority are fit. The main stereotypes that are being evolved are woman are them being called "weak" and unfit for military life. The problem is that this has become a dominant discourse and people consider men being able to handle military tasks than woman. If we think about it, woman are just as fit as men, therefore if a woman is willing to join the military, she can not be denied just because of her gender. Many female soldiers may be criticized by their family since they believe that only men are suppose to be in the army and not woman. However at the end of the day, it is all up to the woman to decide what is best for her.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I wouldn't think so. War is serious. Men are physically superior to woman, that is not to be sexist it's just the way we are built. I doubt most women would be able to considering the large physical requirement. Some stereotypes would die out and more would be created by sexists and other people. Holding her back through negative words, instilling fear in her and just overall putting her down.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I feel that women would be able to handle military life with the same training and preparation as the men do. Back then, men went to battle to protect women, children and the elderly. One of the reasons why they protect women instead of throwing them into battles was to take care of kids and to have kids when soldiers return. The military are filled with men who think women are not up to par. Indeed there are some who fall into that category but there are many who are just as tough as men. An aspiring female soldier would face now are gender discrimination. Her family might even be bashed as to why they would allow their daughter to be a soldier. All in all, it is to serve and protect their country and their intentions are good. Women in the military don't deserve this whatsoever as they are to just serve for the country.

    ReplyDelete

Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.